QOMN v3.2 · Cranelift JIT + AVX2 · IEEE-754 exact · Deterministic Physics Compute · ← All Proofs JSON API ↗ GitHub ↗
Live Compute Proof · IEEE-754 Enforced

Deterministic Engineering Compute
Reproducible simulations for certification-grade systems

QOMN is not a language model. It is a physics-class deterministic compute engine —
designed for engineering simulations, reproducible results, and certification workflows.
LIVE · Numbers pulled from server · Auto-refresh 15s
Scenarios / second
Full IEEE-754 plan evaluation
Pareto latency
170 optimal solutions per call
Parameter sweep / 12 s
Bounded engineering input space
0.0
Variance across runs
Bit-identical · IEEE-754 exact
Values measured in real-time. Throughput fluctuates with CPU load — this is expected behavior for a live compute server.

QOMN is designed for

Engineering compute
  • Deterministic simulation
  • Pareto optimization
  • Certification-grade results
  • NFPA 20 · IEC · ASCE
  • Reproducible benchmarks
Not designed for
  • Language understanding
  • Text generation
  • Conversational AI
  • Heuristic reasoning
  • Open-ended questions

Compute paradigms

Deterministic compute (QOMN)
Given identical inputs → always identical outputs, bit-for-bit. Required for engineering certification (NFPA, IEC, ISO). No variance, no hallucination, no probabilistic drift.
Probabilistic generation (LLMs)
Optimized for language understanding and text generation. Non-deterministic by design. Not suitable for certification-grade engineering calculations.
Numeric solvers (MATLAB / ANSYS)
Accurate for their domain. No JIT physics plans, no Pareto optimization at SIMD speed, no multi-domain single-call coverage.
Compute Paradigms — Characteristics
System type Determinism Throughput Pareto search Certification Primary use case
QOMN v3.2
Deterministic JIT · AVX2
IEEE-754 exact ✓ 170 points/call ✓ NFPA · IEC · ASCE Engineering simulation
MATLAB / ANSYS
numeric solvers
deterministic ~1–50 M/s ✗ separate toolbox ✓ domain-specific Scientific modeling
C++ GCC -O3
manual implementation
✗ UB risk ~5 M/s ✗ manual only ~ depends on impl Performance code
Language Models
GPT-4, Claude, etc.
probabilistic ~1–5 ans/s ✗ not applicable ✗ not applicable Language understanding
Note on LLM row: Language models are not engineering compute engines. Including them here is for reference only — they solve fundamentally different problem classes. Comparing throughput directly would be meaningless.
Pareto Latency — Engineering Compute Systems
QOMN v3.2
C++ SIMD solver
~850 µs
Parameter sweep: QOMN evaluates parameter combinations in bounded engineering input space (flow, pressure, efficiency) in 12 seconds. This is a structured parameter sweep with Pareto optimization — not sampling, not stochastic search.
What QOMN is — honest framing
QOMN replaces non-reproducible workflows:
Spreadsheet engineering (Excel — no Pareto, no audit trail)
Manual sequential solvers (one result at a time, no SIMD)
Non-reproducible calculations (float drift, UB risk)
Bit-identical results across runs, servers, and time.
IEEE-754 exact · auditable · certification-ready
Orders of magnitude faster for parameter sweep optimization workloads.
Live API Log
JSON API ↗ ← All Proofs